Category: Family Planning & Child Rights

  • Rejoice Africa Foundation Activists: Effective Change Means Thinking Ahead

    Rejoice Africa Foundation Activists: Effective Change Means Thinking Ahead

    Mwesigye Robert and the youth he works with at Rejoice Africa Foundation, an organization fully certified by the Government of Uganda, are on a mission. They understand that change happens bottom up, by maximizing ecosocial investment in each child. And unlike many organizations that ignore the role of family planning reforms, they support the idea that family planning should be just and sustainable, with redistribution of wealth to ensure every child an ecosocial fair start in life.

    Embracing that as the first and overriding human right has the greatest impact in moving us towards sustainable development goals.

    Mwesigye Robert had this to say about some of their work:

    I and my organization managed to do a sanitation and hygiene project plot in our local communities in Uganda . We aimed to end plastic pollution, and supplement scarce drinking water supplies, and provide reproductive hygiene for girls in schools .  We constructed one rain water reservoir tank using plastic bottles collected by school children from the communities. Improving girls’ reproductive hygiene can help girls to grow well without reproductive health diseases, while ending plastic pollution ensures a healthy environment for girls while also helping to heal land degradation and reducing breeding areas for malaria-bearing mosquitos. These can be important in the fight for children to get an ecosocial fair start in life.

    Here are a few photos of the project:

    A large pile of discarded plastic bottles and bags is seen outdoors, with a few people sorting through the waste near some trees and houses under a partly cloudy sky.
    Children and adults are sitting and kneeling on a grassy field, planting trees. A group in the background holds a banner promoting environmental protection, with trees and cloudy sky in the distance.
    A group of children outdoors holding a large banner about protecting and preserving the environment and smaller signs. The banner calls on mothers, school kids, teachers, government, and organizations to act for nature.
    A group of students and adults gather outdoors for a tree-planting event. Two men plant a sapling in the soil while others observe. A banner in the background promotes environmental preservation.
    Four men stand on a muddy rural road next to a truck loaded with plants. A white car is parked further down the road, surrounded by green trees and vegetation.
    A group of people stands around a dug-up patch of grass holding a banner that reads, Protect Environment for Next Generation, in front of a building with trees in the background.
    A close-up view of a wall under construction, made from plastic bottles packed with soil and cement, demonstrating an eco-friendly building technique. The bottles are arranged horizontally with their caps facing outward.

    At Fair Start we envision a world of truly democratic communities surrounded by nature. They are constituted of free and equal people, each person has a meaningful role in making the rules under which they live, and each was empowered by the conditions in which they were born and raised.

    That is what true freedom and legitimate governance  – for all – looks like. That vision reflects our most fundamental and objective values: Wellbeing, Equity, Nature, Democracy, and Improving Continuity. That vision can only be achieved by changing the way we plan families, and by constituting future generations around a Fair Start first principle, or grundnorm, of relative self-determination. We may liberate those in this vision, the free entities of the future, from the tyranny of prior generations by all means effective.

    Infographic about Fair Start family planning, highlighting climate impact, reduced extinction risks, 600% return on investment, findings by Nobel laureate Heckman, and the benefits of smaller families for sustainability.

    Take action:

    Urge Natalia Kanem, head of the UNFPA, @Atayeshe as well as the Partners in Population and Development (PPD) to embrace Fair Start as the first and overriding human right, and the basis for all family planning policy. Contact PPD at: CONTACT SECRETARIAT | PPD (partners-popdev.org)

    Fair Start supports Rejoice’s efforts, part of which will include pilot Fair Start programming:

    To give:

    Fundraising for Reforesting and Upping children’s voices in Uganda

    Funds needed: $25000USD

    Rejoice Africa is a youth led organization , community based organization operating in the republic of Uganda . It was founded in 2017 by 25 compassionate Youths  with the spirit to save the next generations . 

    What we do ; 

    1. Climate adaptation and mitigation through Reforestation , Afforestation , Agroforestry , ecosystem and climate awareness in schools .
    2. Poverty alleviation through supporting bee keeping and Rabbit keeping.
    3. Sanitation and hygiene through reproductive health , domestic hygiene and community hygiene.

    Why Reforesting and Upping children’s voices in

    South western Uganda is affected by harsh climate changes ( long term droughts in the year ) caused by human environmental destructive activities (cutting down trees for firewood , clearing land for Agriculture , charcoal burning ) which has affected food security and increased malnutrition cases in the region . People in south western Uganda are not well versed with skills of climate mitigation and adaptation .

    Activities. 

    1; planting 1000000 tree seedlings of eucalyptus , pines , mangoes and avocados on the bare lands of the registered smallholders farmers .

    2; climate education in schools to collect voiceses of school children and communities about climate changes and ways of restoration of climate changes . This will be achieved through climate songs, poems , storytelling and skits .

    Need for donations of $25000USD 

    1. We want to purchase 1000000 seedlings .
    2. We want to purchase garden tools (hoes, watering cans , scissors )
    3. Learning materials (flip-charts , fliers, burners , books )
    4. Transport of the materials .
    5. Continue amplifying children’s voices from school , community on the fair start in environmental friendly activities.
    6. Construction of water tanks using plastic bottles from the community .
    7. 30% of the raised funds will be used to do a plot project of Ecosocial in Uganda .

    How your donation will be distributed .

    30% of the funds will go to do a plot project of the Fair start Movement . 

    35% reforesting project 

    25% Upping the Children’s Voices 

    10% administration .

    And $25000USD is the budget for the whole year 2022(12 months )

    WISE TRANSFER .

    Sender/donor 

    He/she needs to have WISE Transfer account , you can click on the following link : https://wise.com/invite/a/mwesigyer

    After you click on send and follow the procedure . 

    You can send the funds in your currency .

    RECEIVER Address .

    Name : Mwesigye Robert 

    Country : Uganda 

    Email: robertmwesigye1990@gmail.com

    You will be able to see this profile account 👉

    Thank you very much for the solidarity in supporting Rejoice in 2022.

    Rejoice did climate event in schools as more information on the following link 🖇️ https://youtu.be/p0S11-2hgaw

    Photos of the organization below:

    Caring tree seedlings to the field .

    Construction of water tank using plastic bottles from communities.

    The above photos are school children.

  • Despots Use Population to Undermine Democracy. Target Their Base. [w/ Russian Translation]

    Despots Use Population to Undermine Democracy. Target Their Base. [w/ Russian Translation]

    If power derives from the people how we are created matters most of all. Let’s look at Putin and population policy.

    Обратитесь к дочери Путина, Катерине Тихоновой (Контакты — «Иннопрактика» (innopraktika.ru)) с просьбой осудить вторжение и поддержать реформы «Справедливого Старта», которые имеют фундаментальное значение для демократии. 

    What’s unfolding in Ukraine is fundamentally the fault of the United Nations, and a system that – through unsustainable and inequitable family policies – allows top-down power over bottom-up democracy. And while using economic sanctions to respond to military action is a step in the right direction of ending violence, it’s time to go to the next level and empower people over despots from the ground up. The ultimate mistake lies in allowing nations to use future generations to grow their power, rather than empowering future generations as democratic citizens with a voice.

    Putin’s patriarchal family policies – permitted by the United Nations – are a perfect example of what is wrong. They push women to have children to expand state power.

    Imagine if the wealth being spent by Russia on the war in Ukraine were used to improve birth conditions for all children. The impact would be incomparable.

    demographic decline

    Fair Start is pushing back, urging world leaders to make family policies that empower kids for democracy.

    Fair Start is urging Putin’s daughters Katerina Tikhonova and Maria Vorontsova (who can be engaged publicly) wherever they appear to denounce the invasion, use their influence to support democracy in Ukraine, and to support Fair Start reforms that put democracy at the base of who we should be. They had more than a fair start and should want a better beginning for future children in Russia.

    Take action: 

    1. For now we are personally urging our Russian-speaking supporters to politely ask Putin’s daughter Katerina Tikhonova (reachable at Контакты – “Иннопрактика” (innopraktika.ru)) to denounce the invasion, and support the Fair Start reforms that are fundamental to democracy.

    2. We suggest asking International Criminal Court leadership,@IntlCrimCourt and @KarimKhanQC to open an investigation into the commission of war crimes in Ukraine.

    2.  Urge your representatives in Congress to support removing Russia from SWIFT, and to support imposing a NATO no-fly zone. Also, please sign this petition to support the SWIFT action. 

    Build democracy with people, not just policies. 

    Build democracy with people, not just policies. 

  • Decolonizing the Future: Having a Fair Start in the Philippines

    Decolonizing the Future: Having a Fair Start in the Philippines

    How changing the rules for family planning and development will make all the difference

    by Brixton Reyes

    A Fair Start in the Philippines?

    In the Philippines, family is a central and inviolable aspect of Filipino society. Most people’s lives revolve around their families, as is evident through various generations of family members living under the same household not wanting to be separated and through Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) remitting support to their parents and siblings. Despite the level of value Filipinos put on ‘family’, many children are still not given the same degree of importance. These children are victims of unfortunate circumstances from the moment they are born. In an article published by France’s Agency for Development, there are 250,000-1,000,000 homeless children living in the streets of the capital city of Manila.[1] In relation to this, thirty percent (30%) of Filipino children under 5 years old also suffer from stunting due to malnutrition which makes the Philippines one of the top countries in stunting prevalence.[2] Moreover, at least 17% of Filipino children aged 13-17 years old experienced sexual violence while growing up.[3] These are a few among the barrage of issues that plague today’s Filipino youth.

    The same is the very reason I support the Fair Start Movement. A fair start for a Filipino child ensures that they will have a proper home they can live in that is conducive to their holistic development, adequate nutrition to fully develop their physical, mental, & emotional capacities, and safety from abuse and other forms of violence. It is imperative that the Fair Start Model should be included as one of the government’s core policy reforms. Children are referred to as “biyaya ng Diyos” (blessings of God) but our current laws & policies do not reflect this status. The Filipino family should not be an entity to which a child, even as he or she matures, is subservient.

    A key feature of the Fair Start Model is that the right to have children is not a personal and private act within the parents’ exclusive domain. In the current model, which assumes this right belongs privately and exclusively to the parents, our local laws don’t have the same regulatory enforcement.  Compounded with the state’s neglect to provide for free accessible contraception and family planning services to its citizens, this situation allows children to be born to parents who are unprepared to care for them and their own rights are neglected from the start. This state of affairs is supported by different aspects of Philippine society such as religion, socio-cultural norms, and even online trends. Family planning should be child- centric rather than parent or family-centric. An effort to get out of this limbo is the submission of R.A. 10354 otherwise known as the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act or RPRH Law[4] whose implementation is currently not being prioritized. As an effect of this, despite the availability of safeguards, it still snowballs into unwanted pregnancies[5] and eventually, a growing population that ends up uncared for.

    Because of this, I believe that adopting the Fair Start Model is a necessary public act. In doing so, the Philippines can pave the way for more countries to uphold intergenerational justice in the trying times ahead.


    [1] https://www.afd.fr/en/actualites/breath-hope-street-children-philippines

    [2] https://reliefweb.int/report/philippines/undernutrition-philippines-scale-scope-and-opportunities-nutrition-policy-and

    [3]https://www.unicef.org/philippines/media/491/file/National%20Baseline%20Study%20on%20Violence%20Against%20Children%20in%20the%20Philippines:%20Results%20(executive%20summary).pdf

    [4] Republic Act No. 1035

    [5] https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps2110.pdf

  • Open Letter to United Nations Leadership: Condemn Policies Pushing Women to Have Children

    Open Letter to United Nations Leadership: Condemn Policies Pushing Women to Have Children

    Dear Secretary General Gutteres, and Directors Kanem, Andersen, and Russell,

    Several United Nations member states, ignoring the impacts on the climate crisis, the pandemic, human rights, and the sustainable development goals, are intensifying pronatal programs that are designed to push women to have children as a means of expanding economic and other forms of state power.

    These include unsustainable pronatal programs in:

    • Iran (which many human rights organizations have condemned),

    These moves are enabled by the United Nations’ continued misinterpretation and misapplication of the right to have children under Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the relevant provisions of the International Bill of Human Rights. The United Nations should promote sustainable family planning, not an archaic family planning model that does not reflect the requisite nuances of human rights-based family planning. A growing coalition of prominent organizations is calling for reforms to the modeling.

    Not only do pronatal policies reverse progress in mitigating the climate crisis, but they fundamentally exacerbate the pandemics, which are killing millions. At the same time, faced with the United Nations’ historic failure to adopt a sustainable universal family model, nations like India and Nigeria are struggling on their own to stem disastrous growth.

    Democracy, and respect for the future majority, require that family planning be future child-centric, something that inevitably necessitates collective action rather than isolating families in a misleading choice model, as well as centered on ecosocial fairness.

    Infographic showing ways to reduce carbon emissions: reducing fertility rates, doubling car fuel efficiency, increasing wind energy 50-fold, and tripling nuclear energy. Includes icons of a car, windmill, and nuclear symbol.
    Infographic showing humans impact on the planet: habitat loss, global warming, wildlife extinction, and farmed animals. Solutions proposed include smaller families, plant-based eating, renewable energy, and recycling.
    • Inaction threatens the UN’s credibility. Pronatal policies being rolled out in response to a perceived economic “baby bust” show that our current systems of governance are fundamentally illegitimate. If we are willing to create lots of people in whom we invest relatively little in order to satisfy markets and economies, instead of fewer people in whom we invest more in order to build the democracies that must precede, justify and regulate those markets and economies, we are admitting fundamental illegitimacy, or as the peer-reviewed work shows, the preconstitutionality, of our political systems. This is especially true when doing so exacerbates the climate crisis. In that case, all effective measures to correct this inversion are just.
    • The costs of ignoring reproductive justice legal reforms are mounting. These include the costs of the climate emissions that could have been avoided since at least 2007, and the role the failure to require equitable family planning has played in driving the massive and growing gap between rich and poor across the globe. The Fair Start Movement is calculating those costs as harms, and believes world leadership must – and one day will – be held fully accountable for them.
    • Because Fair Start and comparable “creation norm” models are peremptory norms that precede other national and international processes and rights (including property rights), the Fair Start Movement is urging young activists to target concentrations of wealth and power to pay for these eco-social harms, derived fundamentally from poor family planning models, by funding Fair Start efforts and incentives.

    Will you join that call? Nothing would have a greater long-run impact on restoring our environment than simultaneously compensating future generations, while helping them become parts of legitimate democracies, via Fair Start investments in their empowerment and resilience.

    Sincerely,

    Ashley Berke, Co-Director at Fair Start

    Infographic titled Better Family Planning, Simply Put with icons and three points: Delaying parenthood, smaller families, and community support, each explained with brief text and blue graphics.
  • If We Live in Economies Rather Than Democracies, Do We Have to Follow the Rules?

    If We Live in Economies Rather Than Democracies, Do We Have to Follow the Rules?

    If you do a term search on Google for recent media regarding issues around human population growth, you will find that the vast majority of messaging tells us women are not having enough kids and that we are in a “baby bust.” In other words, we are not having enough children to satisfy the ever-present push to ensure the economic growth – and greater returns on investments – that comes with more people.

    A counterargument goes something like this: Policies that allowed that growth to happen drove the climate crisis, enslaved women to expectations of motherhood, and ensured no minimum levels of welfare or equity for children. These are all bad things, and it’s not clear that returns on investments – which generally favor the rich – are worth the trade. Everyone loves free money, but the climate crisis is kind of a big deal, right?

    Line graph showing global population (in billions) and CO2 (relative) from 1800 to 2050. Both lines rise slowly at first, then sharply increase around 1950, with population slightly above CO2 in recent decades.

    But there is a bigger problem with pushing women to have kids for economic reasons. Assuming that how we see future children is how we see our societies, the universal media push (driven often by journalists’ advertisers) to grow our population means that we are essentially economic inputs and comprise economies, measurable in things like gross domestic product. That is who we are.

    This ideology is very different from seeing ourselves as members of a democracy in which, rather than trying to maximize the number of bodies (as consumers, workers, and taxpayers) irrespective of political equity, we try to maximize the civic capacity and effective political voice of each citizen, requiring true equality of opportunity rather than a massive gap between rich and poor. We would be focused on a metric like our empowerment, rather than product.

    Infographic compares two groups: one large, gray crowd labeled People Without Real Say by the government, and one small, colorful group labeled Smaller & Better Democracies. Text suggests smaller families improve democracy.

    And if being in a democracy is what obligates us to follow the rules, because in democracy we make those rules, then being in an economy – essentially, because of who we are – would mean we do not have to follow the rules, rules that protect the property of the rich for example. Robbed of our actual role in the process, and left to gape at politicians over which we each have little or no control, why should we? If governments have simply become adept at hiding violence, for the most part, and now mostly partner with private concentrations of wealth to more subtly use economic incentives to control the populace as some think is the case, as opposed to fulfilling their obligation to ensure the self-determination of people directly applying their will in functional town halls, why follow the rules? None of this would matter if getting to those town halls was impossible. It’s not, thanks to Fair Start and other reforms.

    The “baby bust” messaging is scary for many reasons, but it may also be the key to solving many of our political crises today. If we are worried about democracy we should stop seeing kids as economic inputs and use family reforms like Fair Start to make sure children will be comprising – in terms of maximizing our investment in them, and their development via collective family planning – town halls rather than shopping malls. Then we are freed by the rules under which we live because they are our rules.

    Take action: Urge President Biden to put democracy before economy, and free future generations.

    A comparison chart of Current Family Planning vs. Fair Start Family Planning. The left side lists negatives of current planning; the right side highlights positive outcomes of fair start planning for welfare, equality, and environmental protection.

  • Take Action: More Royal Babies? We Can Do Better

    Take Action: More Royal Babies? We Can Do Better

    Recently Prince William and Kate Middleton joked about having a fourth royal child. Many readers will remember that Fair Start Movement wrote to the Royal family some time ago urging them to publicly adopt just and sustainable family planning modeling instead.

    It’s simple – support a universal ethic of smaller families and shared resources that ensure all kids a level field for development and equal opportunities in life.

    Read the story here!

    Contact the Royal Family here and politely urge them to adopt Fair Start family planning to ensure a future filled with what people need – nature and equity.

    Infographic about Fair Start family planning, highlighting climate impact, reduced extinction risks, 600% return on investment, findings by Nobel laureate Heckman, and the benefits of smaller families for sustainability.

    FAIR START RESEARCH

    • A clear link exists between rapid population growth and poverty. Better family planning and smaller families increase economic prospects by allowing greater investment in each child.  
    • According to the World Bank, in 2015, almost 2 billion people (26% of the world’s population) were living on less than $3.20 per day, and nearly half of the world (46%) was living on less than $5.50 a day. 
    • The costs and benefits of overpopulation under globalization are now distributed by class more than by nation. Labor bears the cost of reduced wage income; capital enjoys the benefit of reduced wage costs. 
    • The United State and much of the capitalist world believed that new bodies were needed to produce more labor. This pro-natal, pro-capital belief has created a world in which huge inequities exist. For example, the world’s 2,153 billionaires have more wealth than 4.6 billion people, which is more than 60% of the planet’s population. 
    • Family size affects those in developed countries as well as underdeveloped nations: In the U.S., the Kansas City Star reported that of more than 6,000 prisoners in 12 states, 1 in 4 was a product of the foster-care system; there is a foster-care-to-prison pipeline in many states. Foster children are also diagnosed with PTSD at a rate greater than Iraq War veterans, and every year, more than 4,000 former foster care kids end up homeless after leaving the system. Meanwhile, the number of American children in foster care increased 12% between 2012 and 2017. 
    • Our current family planning systems provide no minimum standard of well-being for future children, allowing children to be born into failing state systems because their parents cannot care for them. That exacerbates inequity and ensures rich kids stay rich and poor kids stay poor. 
    • Current pronatalist policies sow the seeds of nation destabilization by further increasing inequality. 
    • A recent study from Stanford has found that efforts to mitigate climate change could yield trillions in economic benefits. And the best way to mitigate climate change is to choose smaller families. Yes, it’s more effective than changing diet or forms of transportation. 
    • By the year 2100, the world population could vary by billions of people, depending on whether the average woman in the world today has one child more or one child fewer in her lifetime. If the average woman alive today has between 2 and 3 children, the world population will grow to as many as 16 billion by 2100.
  • Fair Start: An Open Letter to Pope Francis

    Fair Start: An Open Letter to Pope Francis

    Your Holiness,

    We laud your many commitments to social justice and environmental protection. You are bending the arc of the world towards justice in a way few voices can.  And while you have been criticized for your recent comments regarding the need to parent rather than raise pets, we want to offer the Vatican a constructive challenge. 

    The Vatican has roughly thirty-three billion dollars in net worth. Would you consider donating just one thousand dollars to fairstartmovement.org to support a fundamental policy reform that would make every child’s right to a Fair Start in life the first and overriding human right.

    Nothing would speak out against selfishness more than that and give the majority of people – those who will exist in the future – that which they deserve. It’s not about population. People are not numbers. It’s about the impossibility of separating values like welfare, equity, and nature from their creation.

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 55b9382d2acae719008bb381
    The curve represents the opportunity to promote values like child welfare, parental readiness, the restoration of nature, and democracies where each person plays a greater role, or to exploit people as consumers, workers, and taxpayers. We should choose the former, and arc down.

    As Nobel Laureate Steven Chu noted, population growth has acted like a Ponzi scheme that has pulled massive wealth to the top of the economic pyramid at cost to women, children and the environment. It’s a fundamentally unjust and exploitative system. And the greatest impact in reversing it, and furthering the Sustainable Development Goals, comes though changing our family policies to promote an ecosocial Fair Start in life as the first and overriding human right. 

    There is nothing else that comes close to having the impact, long term, on the social justice and environmental causes you support. Without an ecosocial Fair Start in life – with guaranteed minimum levels of welfare approaching equity for each child, the restoration of nature, and democracies where voices actually matter – there is no real justice. All forms justice remain downstream – missing the fundamental phase in which we create and most define power relations.

    Fair Start changes that. It’s the biggest win-win of all. 

    His Holiness speaking out for Fair Start and donating would start a trend, changing the ultimate form of selfishness – the concentration of wealth that could be used to save and improve countless lives – into the ultimate form of impact. Many young people stand ready to support such a trend of giving and planning, putting people and nature before profits and property, and treating Fair Start redistributions as a peremptory norm overriding governmental processes.

    Fair Start is not about population. It’s about people, starting from the source, limiting and decentralizing power, and thus becoming the relatively self-determining – or free – people we deserve to be.

    Will you speak out for real social justice that most effectively furthers the values you have espoused, by supporting all children getting a Fair Start in life? 

    Ashley Berke, Nandita Bajaj, Carter Dillard

    FairStartMovement.org 

    FAIR START RESEARCH

    • A clear link exists between rapid unsustainable growth and poverty. Better family planning increases economic prospects by allowing greater investment in each child.  
    • According to the World Bank, in 2015, almost 2 billion people (26% of the world’s population) were living on less than $3.20 per day, and nearly half of the world (46%) was living on less than $5.50 a day. 
    • The costs and benefits of overpopulation under globalization are now distributed by class more than by nation. Labor bears the cost of reduced wage income; capital enjoys the benefit of reduced wage costs. 
    • The United State and much of the capitalist world believed that new bodies were needed to produce more labor. This pro-natal, pro-capital belief has created a world in which huge inequities exist. For example, the world’s 2,153 billionaires have more wealth than 4.6 billion people, which is more than 60% of the planet’s population. 
    • Family size affects those in developed countries as well as underdeveloped nations: In the U.S., the Kansas City Star reported that of more than 6,000 prisoners in 12 states, 1 in 4 was a product of the foster-care system; there is a foster-care-to-prison pipeline in many states. Foster children are also diagnosed with PTSD at a rate greater than Iraq War veterans, and every year, more than 4,000 former foster care kids end up homeless after leaving the system. Meanwhile, the number of American children in foster care increased 12% between 2012 and 2017. 
    • Our current family planning systems provide no minimum standard of well-being for future children, allowing children to be born into failing state systems because their parents cannot care for them. That exacerbates inequity and ensures rich kids stay rich and poor kids stay poor. 
    • Current pronatalist policies sow the seeds of nation destabilization by further increasing inequality. 
    A collage of logos from various international organizations urging COP26 to support sustainable family planning in response to the climate crisis. The message is written in bold text above the logos.
  • Collective Souls Coalition for Lost Girls: Their Story

    Collective Souls Coalition for Lost Girls: Their Story

    Can We Really Prevent Child Abuse? One Family Rides in Search of an Answer

    A father and his son have set out on a bicycle ride across the nation, from South Florida to Los Angeles. After being raised in abusive situations, and being fortunate enough to find a safe place, now they will not run, they will ride to fight for all children to have a fair start.

    On average, according to FBI statistics, 450 children are murdered by their parents each year in the United States. More than one a day.

    Why can’t governments prevent that? 

    The truth is they can.

    A comparison chart of Current Family Planning vs. Fair Start Family Planning. The left side lists negatives of current planning; the right side highlights positive outcomes of fair start planning for welfare, equality, and environmental protection.

    But a few bad policies – family planning systems that push population growth to fill shopping malls rather than parental readiness to ensure functional town halls, underfunded child protection agencies, misplaced systems of rights that treat children as parental property – are standing in the way. 

    This father and son, inspired by the horrific death of Gabriel Fernandez in 2013, and many others,  set out to expose and change those policies. And along the way they’ve seen the other costs of those policies – the ones that push helpless children into the hands of abusive parents – in the form of nature overrun by people mass produced and uncared for,  and systems of government that look nothing like the inclusive democracies in which we are supposed to live. 

    The nature, the family planning policies that will determine it and future children’s fate, and the road ahead. Can you see the connection between these things?

    But they are also seeing support – a gush of online support, an advocate in the capital of their home state, and the animals in what remains of nature, helpless like the children this ride honors. 

    A person relaxes inside a blue tent set up on sandy ground. Next to the tent are bicycles, bags, and a cart with a chalkboard sign, with greenery and a building in the background.
    On the road.

    The father says this of his son: 

    “Now he plays the vigilante of sorts. Taking matters into his own hands, with me as his sidekick and back up. He pounds the streets with his statistics and petitions with a will to change the world for his peers.”

    Help them end  this, the child abuse, the filicide,  that started their ride and keeps them pedaling towards better places and safer spaces. 

    Follow them on YouTube. 

    Sign their Change.org petition.

    Join their group on Facebook. 

    You can also help change the way we plan families by promoting Fair Start reforms universally. 

  • A Simple Discourse: Who Is Fundamentally Just, and Who Is Not

    A Simple Discourse: Who Is Fundamentally Just, and Who Is Not

    The wealth and power of those – both public and private – at the top of the wealth pyramid was created using an unsustainable and unjust system of growth that 1) violated multiple human rights, 2) foisted its costs on the majority – women and future generations – in ways that prevented self-determination, and 3) is most comprehensively and effectively redressed long term using just and sustainable Fair Start family reforms.

    A circular infographic titled “Fertility Delay Incentives to Planning” shows a leaf in the center with four benefits: Delayed Parenthood, Better Family Planning, Guaranteed Minimum Income, and Equal Opportunity & Education for all kids.

    The system of growth rested on obvious myths – like being born rich versus poor was a matter of some magical “fortune” or hand of god, rather than a failure of nations to implement policies that would ensure birth equity. That myth was designed to prevent concentrations of wealth and power for paying what they owed – under human rights obligations – as investments in future generations.

    Those promoting the system treated the act of having children, something inherently interpersonal, as instead personal in order to preserve fundamental – familial – power structures. They used a misperception of privacy and empowerment, within the home or marketplace, to rob people of those same things at the much more fundamental level – in the inclusive and reflective democracies they were entitled to and which are most determined by the first border of human power – creation .

    An infographic compares two options: on the left, gray figures under “People without real say over their government,” and on the right, colorful families with “Smaller & better democracies.” Text promotes smaller families for fairer representation.

    Those preventing us from constituting ourselves as free and equal people via Fair Start reforms cannot – fundamentally – justify power relations. They prevent our becoming free by moving the flow of power from top-down to bottom-up, through a discourse of collective family planning that physically limits and decentralizes the power we have over each other.

    Let’s be more specific, and less abstract:

    These losses of freedom cannot be separated from one another, or from the family planning norms that create them. To make policies just, we have to make their foundation – people – just, and free.

    A line graph compares median family wealth by age for White and Black Americans born 1943–51. White wealth is consistently much higher, peaking at $317,500 in their 60s, while Black wealth peaks at $54,800.
    Wealth is largely inherited, and the product of past injustice.

    How can we identify who is a precon, and who is moving towards freedom by helping constitute future generations – the majority of persons – in a just way via child-centric planning? Precons will remain abstract and self-contradictory when pressed on how they will promote the relative self-determination of future persons, even when they are asked to use simple metrics like wellbeing and equity. They will contravene values, like healthy ecologies, they clearly value as demonstrated through their own actions when it comes to ensuring those values for future generations – the majority. They will put existing property rights over investing equitably in the majority of persons – future generations.

    Free people, on the other hand, will begin the development of any policy by 1) treating self-determination as inverse to population growth (which means democracy is functioning, fundamentally, as it should and moving toward relatively self-determining populations) and 2) promoting our constituting new democracies of free and equal persons through a discourse of collective family planning that would create functional constitutional conventions of relatively self-determining persons.*

    *note that the appeal of corporations may stem from their ability to imitate such groups relative to bloated nation states, but their purpose and structure make them anathema to true democracies.

    Those moving towards freedom will first act in ways that support fundamental justice. They will want to come from a just place, and they will act as though people actually matter, politically. They will act as though each person is empowered equally. This is the litmus test for democracy.

    TAKE ACTION:

    Fair Start family planning

    A stylized illustration shows a cityscape with silhouettes of people walking, biking, and talking. Icons connected by lines represent recycling, equality, justice, education, technology, and the environment.

    WHEN COMMUNITIES AND GOVERNMENTS PRIOTIZE A FAIR START IN LIFE AS THE FIRST

    HUMAN RIGHT

    Illustration of a small college campus with several buildings, a playground, trees, deer, flying birds, and mountains in the background under a blue sky.

    WE INVEST MORE IN FAMILIES AND HELP PARENTS BE READY, EMPOWERED, AND POSITIONED

    FOR SUCCESS

    Illustration of a smiling family with a woman in glasses, a man with short hair, and a young girl with pigtails, standing together in front of a city skyline.

    KIDS GET A FAIR START AND OUR FUTURE IS PROTECTED